Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Friday, 12 December 2014

Why Skype Wants to Learn your Language

Microsoft's announcement of the imminent arrival of real-time speech-to-speech translation software in the shape of Skype Translator will need to ride a wave of public scepticism, before it lives up to the hype of bringing a revolution in communication that it promises to deliver

In Douglas Adams' fabulously humorous science fiction adventure, The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy, instant translation is achieved via the Babel fish, which fits in the ear of the user and instantly allows you to understand anything said to you in any form of language. Yahoo even paid tribute to Adams' fictitious animal by calling their original online translation service, BabelFish.com, before changing it to the slightly more prosaic, Bing Translator.
In creating the Babel Fish, Adams set the bar extremely high for any type of machine translation - albeit his version was a fish - perhaps Yahoo even realised they weren't living up to such high expectations and that's why they changed the name! The reality is that any form of translation service that hypes itself as instant translation is going to have to overcome that scepticism, before the public accepts it as offering anything anywhere near what it claims to deliver.
The problem is that we have all experienced online translation services, from Google Translate to Bing Translator, and, whilst they can be useful in a range of circumstances, they also have severe limitations. They often mis-translate with humorous and worrying frequency, but that ls not to say there hasn't been some slow and discernible improvements, particularly with Google Translate, which is where most of my experience lies.

Skype Translator's Unveiling

At an event in July, Skype demonstrated the service to its Worldwide Partner Conference, which was, you would have thought, a generally sympathetic audience. Even they, however, were unable to stifle their laughter when the opening pleasantries in English and German were amusingly mistranslated as:
Well how is it me friends.
Sounding a bit more like Jack Sparrow than an accurate translation of the original, it thereby confirmed the prejudices of a sceptical audience in six short words! Nevertheless, the service, and the presentation, did manage to redeem itself slightly with some light-hearted banter about the World Cup and the lack of English success, compared to that of Germany. It was clever, without being breathtaking, and it's not quite achieved the Babel Fish standard yet, but that's not to say it won't.

Machine Learning

Skype are currently offering the chance to pre-register for the Skype Translatorservice ahead of its official launch. The registration page openly admits that it will have 'a few rough edges' at first - as the WPC event confirmed - but the more it translates, then the more that the machine learning algorithms will be able to incorporate patterns of speech, idioms, accents, and colloquialisms. And this will be the real test of its ability to accurately translate living languages that have been evolving and developing since humans first began to talk.

The Babel Fish Test

To help us to assess the effectiveness of Skype Translator, I've come up with the Babel Fish test, which is the language translation equivalent of the Turing Test for a computer. If we can converse through it and not feel that it is being mediated by a machine and that it also feels natural and authentic - and above all accurate - then Skype Translator will have passed the Babel Fish test.
When Skype Translator launches, I suspect it may initially be ridiculed and provide fodder for many amusing virals and even skits on Saturday Night Live. But if the machine learning is able to incorporate all of the quirks and differences that characterize the various languages it will be required to translate, then it has a future. But that is a big ask! The more that we use it, the better it will get, but if we loose confidence in it at an early stage, then a lack of use will hamper its development. And if that happens, then we'll just have to wait for the next contender to pass the Babel Fish test!
So the launch of Skype Translator won't mean the arrival of the Babel Fish any time too soon, but as an online translator might say: here's hoping the day well goes for you, me friends!
Will Trevor is the Founder and Training Consultant at Windsor Training. Please click 'Follow' if you would like to hear more from Will in the future. Feel free to also connect via his Linkedin page, or via Twitter and Facebook or email: will.trevor@windsortraining.net
Other recent and popular posts by Will:

Sunday, 26 October 2014

Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? Who will we remember in 50 years?

I’d like to get a debate going and I’d like to have your views.
Two of the greatest technological and entrepreneurial leaders of this age are Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, but how will we remember them in terms of their legacy of leadership and entrepreneurship? Who will we remember in years to come for their legacy to future generations?
Gates has the advantage of still having time to shape his legacy, whereas Jobs’s deeds are now cast in stone and open to interpretation. Maybe it’s a little unfair to set this up as a boxing match between two entrepreneurial heavyweights, but my question was inspired by the comments of best-selling Canadian author and speaker, Malcolm Gladwell.

Jobs: The 'Tweaker'

In an article in the New Yorker, Gladwell said that Jobs was more of a ‘tweaker’, rather than a true innovator and visionary. He argues that Jobs didn’t invent the graphical user interface (GUI) and the mouse, instead he took the ideas from the Xerox research center at Palo Alto (PARC). He also didn’t invent the iPod, he waited until early MP3 technology had been tested and developed elsewhere and then launched his own device. Gladwell says of Jobs:
"Every single idea he ever had, came from somebody else. And he would be the first to say this. He would also take credit for things. He was shameless. He was an extraordinarily brilliant businessman and entrepreneur. He was also a self-promoter on a level that we have rarely seen.

Gates: The Philanthropist

Gates, on the other hand, would be remembered for his charitable work and the fact that he has established the Gates Foundation with billions of his own money, claiming that there would be statues of him across the Third World, not for his entrepreneurship or leadership, but because his money is likely to fund a cure for malaria.

In Defence of Jobs

Defending Jobs, the Forbes columnist, Frederick Allen, argues that Gladwell gets the nature of invention and Job’s achievements wrong. According to Allen, if you use Gladwell’s definition, then all of greatest inventions are tweaks: Ford didn’t invent the automobile; the Wright brothers didn’t invent flying; and there were a number of light bulbs before Edison’s.
What Jobs did was to build a better device for the storing and retrieval of music and he also built an ecosystem to support it, with the iTunes platform. As for the mouse and the GUI, Steve Jobs biographer, Walter Isaacson, points out how limited the developments were that PARC had made and that the Apple team brought the whole desktop dream to reality, enabling things to be dragged, dropped, resized and manipulated, like never before.

So what do you think: will we remember Gates for his charitable work and Jobs as an innovator and visionary? What do you think will be their legacy in 50 years’ time?

Will Trevor is the Founder and Training Consultant at Windsor Training. Please click 'Follow' if you would like to hear more from Will in the future. Feel free to also connect via his Linkedin page, or via Twitter and Facebook or email: will.trevor@windsortraining.net
Other recent and popular posts by Will:
Photo: flikr.com